Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes, get the Optimal Living Daily workbook, and learn more at: OLDPodcast.com.
Episode 2924:
Jesse Cramer explores how smart financial planning mirrors basketball strategy: take the guaranteed shot instead of chasing risky gains. He explains how narrowing the range of outcomes through careful planning like diversifying investments or giving yourself time leads to financial dependability and peace of mind, avoiding unnecessary risks.
Read along with the original article(s) here: https://bestinterest.blog/slam-dunk-financial-planning/
Quotes to ponder:
"There’s a 60% chance I live the exact lifestyle I want to in retirement. But no matter what, all three scenarios are acceptable to me, so there’s a 100% chance I’ll enjoy life throughout my retirement."
"Reducing your range of outcomes has many benefits. In this particular basketball scenario, simple math supports it; 99% of 2 points is better than ~40% of 3 points."
"Why risk something you have and need for something you don’t have and don’t need?"
Episode references:
Risk Parity Radio podcast: https://www.riskparityradio.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
[00:00:01] Dieser komplexe Finanzierungstalk ist ganz schön anstrengend. Ob ich mein Depot jemals angelegt krieg?
[00:00:06] Aber du hast doch schon ein Depot.
[00:00:08] Äh, nee.
[00:00:09] Doch, du hast das Vodafone Gigadepot.
[00:00:11] Ach, stimmt! Und da hab ich ja selbst in der Hand, wie groß mein Depot ist.
[00:00:15] Jetzt mit dem Vodafone Gigadepot unverbrauchtes Datenvolumen in den nächsten Monat mitnehmen.
[00:00:19] Go on im zuverlässigen 5G-Netz von Vodafone. Vodafone. Together we can.
[00:00:26] Brauchen wir wirklich noch einen Computer? Alle wahrscheinlich nicht.
[00:00:29] Aber wenn du Musik mit der Power eines Neuralprozessors neu erfindest, oder unterwegs Migrationsmuster mit einem ganztägigen Akku analysierst,
[00:00:36] oder deine Ideen mit dem KI-gesteuerten Co-Creator zum Leben erwächst, dann kann ein Co-Pilot-Plus-PC einen Unterschied machen.
[00:00:42] Nicht alle brauchen einen leistungsstärkeren KI-Computer.
[00:00:44] Aber wenn du versuchst, die Welt zu verändern, auch wenn es nur deine eigene ist, haben wir einen für dich entwickelt.
[00:00:49] Microsoft Co-Pilot-Plus-PC mit Snapdragon. Die bisher schnellsten und intelligentesten Windows-PCs.
[00:00:54] Die Akkulaufzeit variiert je nach Nutzung und Einstellungen.
[00:00:56] Das ist Optimal Finance Daily.
[00:00:59] Slam Dunk Financial Planning.
[00:01:01] By Jesse Kramer of BestInterest.blog.
[00:01:04] Und ich bin deine host und Personal Finance Enthusiast, Diana Merriam.
[00:01:08] Wir werden jetzt gleich in die Woche zu starten.
[00:01:12] Als wir optimieren Ihre Leben.
[00:01:18] Slam Dunk Financial Planning.
[00:01:20] By Jesse Kramer of BestInterest.blog.
[00:01:24] I don't watch many live sports these days.
[00:01:27] Life is busy.
[00:01:29] But I've caught a few quarters of NBA playoff basketball, and I'll watch game replays while sipping morning coffee.
[00:01:36] If you're unaware, the NBA has been revolutionized by moneyball ideas over the past decade.
[00:01:42] The main new idea affects three-point shots.
[00:01:46] The ratio of attempted three-point shots has increased dramatically in recent years.
[00:01:51] Yet, despite the league's new widespread emphasis on three-point shots, one basketball maxim remains true.
[00:02:00] A wide-open layup or slam dunk is always worth taking.
[00:02:04] A guaranteed two points is better than a possible three points.
[00:02:10] Reducing your range of outcomes has many benefits.
[00:02:13] In this particular basketball scenario, simple math supports it.
[00:02:19] 99% of two points, a near-guaranteed dunk, is better than approximately 40% of three points, the approximate make percentage of three-point shots.
[00:02:30] There are ancillary benefits too.
[00:02:33] A reduced range of outcomes is simply more dependable and thus easier to plan for.
[00:02:38] Smart financial planning reduces the range of outcomes in your life, specifically by decreasing the odds of financial failure.
[00:02:47] The more I study successful financial plans, the more true this idea becomes.
[00:02:52] A good financial plan will identify possible failure mechanisms, such as risks and abate them,
[00:03:01] provide options for short- and long-term flexibility, that is, ways to go around future obstacles,
[00:03:09] and increase the probability that you reach your unique goals, even if decreasing the odds that you die filthy rich.
[00:03:19] Devil's Advocate
[00:03:21] What I don't mean
[00:03:22] I think the devil's advocate would hear those words and say,
[00:03:27] Jesse, just buy a 30-year bond.
[00:03:29] Guaranteed 4.6% rate.
[00:03:32] There's your outcome.
[00:03:33] No variance to it whatsoever.
[00:03:35] Or perhaps worse.
[00:03:37] Jesse, buy an indexed life annuity.
[00:03:41] Wait 10 years, then start collecting your guaranteed 4% annual returns for life.
[00:03:47] No variance.
[00:03:48] It's true.
[00:03:50] Both investment ideas have a singular range of outcomes.
[00:03:53] And I just touted that as a good thing.
[00:03:56] But to be clear, I believe those specific outcomes are pretty bad.
[00:04:02] Long-duration bonds expose us to a terrible amount of inflation risk.
[00:04:08] Annuities are almost always a complete racket.
[00:04:12] I'm not seeking guarantees at any cost.
[00:04:15] I want to be very wary of the costs.
[00:04:18] Some examples.
[00:04:20] What exactly do I mean?
[00:04:23] Life insurance protects against catastrophic failure mechanisms.
[00:04:27] That you die and leave your family's finances in a lurch.
[00:04:30] I want to eradicate that outcome.
[00:04:34] Blow it off the map.
[00:04:35] While whole life insurance and similar ideas are frequently atrocious products.
[00:04:41] A good term life policy is essential if loved ones depend on your income.
[00:04:46] A diversified portfolio is another way to narrow the range of potential outcomes.
[00:04:52] It will always underperform some of its constituent parts and always outperform others.
[00:04:58] An equal-weighted portfolio of all the asset classes never wins.
[00:05:03] But it never loses.
[00:05:05] It does reduce the range of outcomes, providing a reliable level of investment returns.
[00:05:12] It provides an expectation, a foundation from which you can build a sturdy financial plan.
[00:05:18] But Jesse, stocks outperform bonds over the long run.
[00:05:22] Yes, it's true.
[00:05:24] On average, stocks do outperform bonds.
[00:05:26] But an important adage in financial planning is to never forget the six-foot-tall person
[00:05:32] who drowned crossing the stream that was five feet deep on average.
[00:05:36] Or put it another way, a long-term average can gloss over nasty short-term blips.
[00:05:43] However, the short-term volatility of stocks can cause our human wiring to short-circuit.
[00:05:49] When applied to portfolio management,
[00:05:51] that simple human fallacy is one of Danny Kamen's most prolific ideas.
[00:05:57] Another way to reduce your range of outcomes is to give yourself more time.
[00:06:02] Perhaps my favorite Jack Bogle quote is that
[00:06:05] reversion to the mean is the iron law of investing.
[00:06:09] The only way to experience that reversion to the mean is to buy and hold a stable allocation of assets
[00:06:17] for a long period of time.
[00:06:19] We've seen 10-year periods where the S&P has returned more than 20% per year.
[00:06:25] We've also seen 10-year periods of decidedly negative S&P returns.
[00:06:30] That's a wide range of outcomes.
[00:06:33] But over 30-year periods, we see an amazing reversion to the mean.
[00:06:39] Everything ends up in the 5-8% range.
[00:06:44] Simply put, time allows us to reduce our range of outcomes.
[00:06:49] Personally, I think humility and contentedness are beneficial too.
[00:06:54] A good retirement plan would lead a retiree to say,
[00:06:57] There's a 60% chance I live the exact lifestyle I want in retirement.
[00:07:03] There's a 30% chance my lifestyle is slightly better than I expected.
[00:07:07] There's a 10% chance my lifestyle is slightly worse than I expected.
[00:07:12] But no matter what, all three scenarios are acceptable to me.
[00:07:16] So there's a 100% chance I'll enjoy life throughout my retirement.
[00:07:21] That's a reasonable range of outcomes.
[00:07:23] It takes humility and contentedness to accept that.
[00:07:28] Imagine I took the previous scenario and poured some gas on the portfolio,
[00:07:32] such that the retiree said,
[00:07:35] There's a 60% chance I live the exact lifestyle I want in retirement.
[00:07:39] There's a 30% chance my lifestyle is way better than I expected.
[00:07:44] And there's a 10% chance my lifestyle is way worse than I expected.
[00:07:50] Would you pursue way better at the risk of way worse?
[00:07:55] Do you need to take that risk?
[00:07:57] To each their own.
[00:07:59] But I posit,
[00:08:00] No way, Jose.
[00:08:01] I don't want to intentionally widen my range of outcomes in any way.
[00:08:06] Why risk a lifestyle that is perfectly tolerable for one that is intolerable?
[00:08:12] As Uncle Warren says about taking unnecessary risk,
[00:08:16] Why risk having something you have and need for something you don't have and don't need?
[00:08:22] If you can build a reasonable expectation of long-term returns, that is, a narrow range of investment outcomes,
[00:08:30] you can design a specific future state.
[00:08:33] You can plan to spend, save, gift, grow, etc. in a precise way.
[00:08:39] That sounds pretty good to me.
[00:08:40] Flexibility helps too.
[00:09:12] I want to spend, save, etc. in a precise way.
[00:09:17] I want your personal finances to be high-scoring, don't get me wrong.
[00:09:24] But I don't want stomach-churning uncertainty.
[00:09:26] I want dependability.
[00:09:28] I want an easy slam dunk.
[00:09:35] You just listened to the post titled,
[00:09:37] Slam Dunk Financial Planning, by Jesse Kramer of bestinterest.blog.
[00:09:42] And I'll be right back with my commentary.
[00:09:45] Buy low, sell high.
[00:09:47] It's easy to say, hard to do.
[00:09:50] For example, high interest rates are crushing the real estate market right now.
[00:09:55] Demand is dropping and prices are falling,
[00:09:57] even for many of the best assets.
[00:10:00] It's no wonder the Fundrise flagship fund plans to go on a buying spree,
[00:10:06] expanding its billion-dollar real estate portfolio over the next few months.
[00:10:10] You can add the Fundrise flagship fund to your portfolio in just minutes,
[00:10:15] and with as little as $10, by visiting fundrise.com slash OFD.
[00:10:21] That's F-U-N-D-R-I-S-E dot com slash OFD.
[00:10:28] Carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses
[00:10:33] of the Fundrise flagship fund before investing.
[00:10:37] This and other information can be found in the fund's prospectus
[00:10:41] at fundrise.com slash flagship.
[00:10:45] This is a paid advertisement.
[00:10:48] Fundrise flagship.
[00:10:50] For many people is the best way, a nice day to ruin.
[00:10:54] But at Zendesk we are looking for a better Customer Experience.
[00:10:57] Better for the Großmutter.
[00:10:59] Better for the Florist.
[00:11:00] Better for the young man in House 3A.
[00:11:02] Better for all.
[00:11:04] Because while some say, that the customer always has rights,
[00:11:07] we say that the customer always are people.
[00:11:10] And since we are also people, we want to do something good for us all.
[00:11:14] Zendesk.
[00:11:15] Customer Experience with KI.
[00:11:16] For Menschen gemacht.
[00:11:17] Jessie did such a great job of dispelling some misconceptions that many people have about
[00:11:23] investing.
[00:11:24] It's not about beating the market.
[00:11:26] It isn't complicated.
[00:11:28] You aren't going to lose all of your money.
[00:11:31] And it's not as risky as that whole life insurance salesperson would lead you to believe.
[00:11:36] But investing in the stock market does tend to bring on emotions of fear and greed.
[00:11:41] We're afraid it's too risky.
[00:11:43] Or our greed causes us to take on unnecessary risk in an effort to beat the market.
[00:11:50] If you take this simple approach of matching the market versus trying to beat it,
[00:11:55] you buy all the stocks through index funds versus picking stocks,
[00:11:59] and you focus on the long term versus gambling with a get-rich-quick strategy,
[00:12:04] you are pretty much guaranteed to win with investing in the stock market.
[00:12:10] I love the quote in today's article from Warren Buffett, who said,
[00:12:14] Why risk something you have and need for something you don't have and don't need?
[00:12:20] It reminds me of what my friend Frank Vasquez over on the Risk Parity Radio podcast says
[00:12:26] about financial goals.
[00:12:28] He says that when you win the game of money,
[00:12:31] meaning when you reach financial independence and have enough money to stop working,
[00:12:35] there is little utility in continuing to play the game.
[00:12:39] Greed is a tricky emotion,
[00:12:41] and our societal conditioning tells us that more is always better.
[00:12:47] However, I've come to realize that enough money is actually better than more money,
[00:12:53] because it allows you to put the entire pursuit to rest
[00:12:57] and focus on what really matters in life.
[00:13:00] And that's a wrap for another Monday show.
[00:13:03] Have a great rest of your day and start to your week.
[00:13:05] And I'll be back tomorrow as usual, where your optimal life awaits.




